Where have all the hurricanes gone?1st January 2015
Last year’s hurricane season passed off relatively quietly. Gonzalo, a Category 2 hurricane, hit Bermuda in October 2014, briefly making the world’s headlines, but it did relatively little damage, apart from uprooting trees and knocking out power temporarily to most of the island’s inhabitants.
It is now approaching ten years since a major hurricane hit the United States, when four powerful hurricanes – Dennis, Katrina, Rita and Wilma – slammed into the country in the space of a few months in 2005.
There have been a number of reasons put forward for why there has been a succession of seasons when no major storms have hit the US.
There have been a number of reasons put forward for why there has been a succession of seasons when no major storms have hit the US. They include: a much drier atmosphere in the Atlantic basin due to large amounts of dust blowing off the Sahara Desert; the El Niño effect; warmer sea surface temperatures causing hurricanes to form further east in the Atlantic, meaning they stay out at sea rather than hitting land.
Although this is by far the longest run in recent times of no big storms hitting the United States, it isn’t abnormal to go several years without a big hurricane. “From 2000 to 2003 there were no major landfalling hurricanes,” says Richard Dixon, Group Head of Catastrophe Research at Hiscox. “Indeed there was only one between 1997 and 2003: Bret, a Category 3 hurricane that hit Texas in 1999.”
There then came two of the most devastating hurricane seasons on record in 2004 and 2005, during which seven powerful storms struck the United States.
The quiet before the storm
An almost eerie calm has followed these very turbulent seasons. Could it be that we are entering a new, more unpredictable era when long periods of quiet are punctuated by intense bouts of violent storms?
“Not necessarily”, says Dixon. “Neither should we be lulled into a false sense of security just because no major hurricanes – that is Category 3 or higher – have hit the US coast,” he says.
It would be dangerous to assume there has been a step change in major-landfalling hurricane behaviour.
There have in fact been plenty of hurricanes in recent years – it’s just that very few of them have hit the United States. Those that have – Irene in 2011 and Sandy in 2013 – had only Category 1 hurricane wind speeds by the time they hit the US mainland – although both still caused plenty of damage.
The number of hurricanes that formed in the Atlantic basin each year between 2006 and 2013 has been generally in line with the average number for the period since 1995, when the ocean temperatures have risen relative to the ‘cold phase’ that stretched from the early 1960s to the mid-1990s.
On average around seven hurricanes have formed each season in the period 2006-2013, roughly three of which have been major storms. “So although we haven’t seen the big landfalling hurricanes, the potential for them has been there,” says Dixon.
Why the big storms that have brewed have not hit the United States is a mixture of complicated climate factors – such as atmospheric pressure over the Atlantic, which dictates the direction, speed and intensity of hurricanes, and wind shear, which can tear a hurricane apart.
There have been several near misses: Hurricane Ike, which hit Texas in 2008, was close to being a Category 3, while Hurricane Dean, which hit Mexico in 2007, was a Category 5 – the most powerful category of storm, with winds in excess of 155 miles per hour.
That’s not to say there is not plenty of curiosity as to why there have recently been no powerful US landfalling hurricanes. This desire to understand exactly what’s going on has prompted new academic research. For example, Hiscox is sponsoring postdoctoral research at Reading University into the atmospheric troughs known as African easterly waves. Although it is known that many hurricanes originate from these waves, there is currently no understanding of how the intensity and location of these waves change from year to year and what impact they might have on hurricane activity.
Atlantic basin numbers per season
Atlantic landfalling numbers per season
The dearth of big landfalling hurricanes has both helped and hurt the insurance industry. Years without any large bills to pay from hurricanes have helped the global reinsurance industry’s overall capital to reach a record level of $575 billion by January 2015, according to data from Aon Benfield.
But, as a result, competition for business is intense, and prices for catastrophe cover have been falling; a trend that continued at the latest January 1 renewals.
Meanwhile, the values at risk from an intense hurricane are rising fast. Florida – perhaps the most hurricane-prone state in the US – is experiencing a building boom. In 2013, permissions to build $18.2 billion of new residential property were granted in Florida, the second-highest amount in the country behind California, according to US government statistics.
We certainly shouldn’t think that next year will necessarily be as quiet as the past few have been.
“The increasing risk resulting from greater building density in Florida has been offset by the bigger capital buffer the insurance industry has built up,” says Mike Palmer, Head of Analytics and Research at Hiscox Re. But, he adds: “It will still be interesting to see how the situation pans out if there’s a major hurricane.”
Of course, a storm doesn’t need to be a powerful hurricane to create enormous damage. Sandy was downgraded from a hurricane to a post-tropical cyclone before making landfall along the southern New Jersey coast in October 2012, but it wreaked havoc as it churned up the northeastern US coast. The estimated overall bill has been put at $68.5 billion by Munich Re, of which around $29.5 billion was picked up by insurers.
Although Dixon acknowledges that the current barren spell of major landfalling hurricanes is unusually long, he remains cautious. “It would be dangerous to assume there has been a step change in major-landfalling hurricane behaviour.”
Scientists predict that climate change will lead to more powerful hurricanes in coming years. If global warming does lead to warmer sea surface temperatures then evidence shows that it tends to make big storms grow in intensity.
Even without the effects of climate change, the factors are still in place for there to be some intense hurricane seasons for at least the next couple of years, Dixon argues. “The hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin in recent years suggests to me that we’re still in a warm phase of sea surface temperatures – a more active hurricane period, in other words. So we certainly shouldn’t think that 2015 will necessarily be as quiet as the past few have been.”
Predictions of hurricanes are made on a range of timescales and the skill involved in these varies dramatically. On short timescales (from days to up to a week) forecasts of hurricane tracks are now routinely made with impressive results. For example, Hurricane Gonzalo was forecast to pass very close to Bermuda over a week before it hit the island, giving its inhabitants a chance to prepare. Such advances in weather forecasting have been helped by vast increases in computing power and by ‘dynamical models’ of the atmosphere.
These models work using a grid system that encompasses all or part of the globe, in which they work out climatic factors, such as sea surface temperature and atmospheric conditions, in each particular grid square. Using this information and a range of equations they are then able to forecast the behaviour of the atmosphere over coming days, including the direction and strength of tropical storms.
But even though computing power has improved massively in recent years, each of the grid squares in the dynamical models typically corresponds to an area of many square miles, so it’s impossible to take into account every cloud or thunderstorm in that grid that would contribute towards a hurricane’s strength. This, combined with the fact that it is impossible to know the condition of the atmosphere everywhere, means there will always be an element of uncertainty in the forecast. And while these models can do very well at predicting a hurricane’s track, they currently struggle to do as good a job with storm intensity.
Recent years have seen the advent of forecasts aimed at predicting the general character of the coming hurricane season some months in advance. These seasonal forecasts have been attracting increasing media fanfare and go as far as forecasting the number of named storms, of powerful hurricanes and even of landfalling hurricanes.
Most are not based on complicated dynamical models (although these do exist) but tend to be based on statistical models that link historical data on hurricanes with atmospheric variables, such as the El Niño. But as Richard Dixon, Hiscox’s Group Head of Catastrophe Research says: “There is a range of factors that can affect the coming hurricane season, and these statistical schemes only account for some of them. As a result they don’t tend to be very skilful, although they are often able to do better than simply basing your prediction on the historical average.”
It would be great if the information contained in seasonal forecasts could be used to help inform catastrophe risk underwriting, but as Mike Palmer, Head of Analytics and Research for Hiscox Re explains, this is a difficult proposition. “Let’s say for example that a seasonal forecast predicts an inactive hurricane season, with only one named storm compared to an average of five. It would be tempting to write more insurance and reinsurance on the basis of that forecast. However, even if it turns out to be true, if the single storm that occurs is a Category 5 hurricane that hits Miami, the downside would be huge.”
That’s not to say that there is no useful information about hurricane frequency that underwriters can use to inform their underwriting. Catastrophe models provide the framework to allow them to do just that. These models have become the dominant tools by which insurers try to predict the likely frequency and severity of natural disasters. “A cat model won’t tell you what will happen precisely in the coming year, but it will let you know what the range of possible outcomes may be,” says Dixon.
The danger comes if you blindly follow the numbers, says Palmer. That’s because although the models will provide a number for the estimated cost, for example, of the Category 5 hurricane hitting Miami, that figure masks an enormous number of assumptions, such as the expected damage to a wooden house as opposed to a brick apartment building. These variables can cause actual losses to differ significantly from the model estimates. As a result, many reinsurers are increasingly using cat models as a starting point to working out their own risk, rather than using an off-the-shelf version to provide the final answer.
Since 2005, Hiscox has developed its own view of risk, which is based on a modified version of the models. “Where we feel less comfortable with the models’ results or the science included in the model, or where they contrast with what we know has happened from our own books of business, then we make adjustments, recalibrating them to tally more closely with our own understanding and experience,” explains Palmer. “In a world in which catastrophe models are now commonly used, it is vitally important to have experts who can get under the models’ bonnets to understand how they work,” Palmer adds. “Hiscox prides itself on having just such an approach, and it is incorporating that into its risk management and underwriting. We see it as one of our key differentiators.”